Home Complete bibliography

Complete bibliography

In order to be as helpful as possible, the list below contains a fairly complete bibliography of articles not only related to the Dimensional Overlap Model, but also to any of the reaction time experiments and effects that the Dimensional Overlap Model accounts for, as well as other models of reaction time and theoretical influences on the DO model. All of the citations found in the educational articles on this site should also have their full references here. If you feel that there are any papers relevant to this literature that are not included, please let us know.

Articles that focus specifically on the Dimensional Overlap Model are highlighted and marked with a [DO] at the end of the reference, for easy search and identification.

 


 

Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years.  In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (eds), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 183-218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications  (Fourth Edition).   San Fransisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

Anscombe, F. J. (1967). Topics in the investigation of linear relations fitted by the method of least squares (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 90, 1-52.

Arend, U., & Wandmacher, J. (1987). On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks.  Acta Psychologica, 65, 193-210.

Babbit, B. C. (1982). Effect of task demands on dual coding of pictorial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 73-80.

Baldo, J. V., Shimamura, A. P., & Prinzmetal, W. (1998). Mapping symbols to response modalities: Interference effects on Stroop-like tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 427-437.

Barber, P. J., & O’Leary, M. J. (1997). The relevance of salience: Towards an activational account of irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility effects.  In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.) Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility (pp. 135-172). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science.

Barber, P. J., O’Leary, M. J., & Simon, J. R. (1994). Defining stimulus congruity: A rejoinder to Guiard, Hasbroucq, & Possamai (1994). Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 213-215.

Bashore, T. R., & Osman, A. (1987).  On the temporal relation between perceptual analysis and response selection: A psychophysiological investigation of stimulus congruency and S-R compatibility effects on human information processing. Poster presented at the Fourth International Congress of Cognitive Neuroscience, Dourdan, France.

Bauer, D. W., & Miller, J. (1982). Stimulus-response compatibility and the motor system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 367-380.

Beall, P. M. & Herbert, A. M. (2008). The face wins: Stronger automatic processing of affect in facial expressions than words in a modified Stroop task. Cognition and Emotion, 22(8), 1613-1642.

Botella, J. (1996). Decision competition and response competition: Two main factors in the flanker compatibility effect. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (eds.) Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (pp. 503-518). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bower, G. H. (1975). Cognitive psychology: An introduction. In W. K. Estes (ed.), Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 1. Introduction to concepts and issues (pp. 25-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Brebner, J. (1979). The compatibilty of spatial and non-spatial relationships. Acta Psychologica, 43, 23-32.

Broadbent, D.E. & Gregory, M. (1965).   On the interaction of S-R compatibility with other variables affecting reaction times, British J. of Psychology, 1, 61-67.

Brunia, C. H., & van den Bosch, W. E.  (1984).  Movement-related slow potentials:  I. A contrast between finger and foot movements in right-handed subjects.  Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 57, 515-527.

Bundesen, C., & Shibuya, H. (eds). (1995). Visual Selective Attention. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cohen, A., Fuchs, A., Bar-Sela, A., Brumberg, Y., & Magen, H. (1999). Correlational cuing as a function of target complexity and target-flanker similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 275-290.

Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. E. (1993). Orientation asymmetry in the flanker test. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 693-703.

Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. E. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints on response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.

Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K. & McClelland, J. L. (1990).  On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.  Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.

Cohen, J. D., & Huston, T. A. (1994). Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.) Attention and Performance XV. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., & McClelland, J. L. (1992).  A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity: Principles and models.  American Journal of Psychology, 105, 239-269.

Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.

Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-553.

Coombs, C. H., Dawes, R. M., & Tversky, A. (1970).  Mathematical Psychology: An Elementary Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice-Hall.

Craft, J. L. & Simon, J. R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415-420.

Crossman, E. (1953). Entropy and choice time: The effect of frequency unbalance on choice-response. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5, 41-52.

DeJong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.

De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988).  The use of partial information in response processing.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.

Dunbar, K. N. (1986). Multiple sources of interference in a picture-word analogue of the Stroop task.  Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.

Dyer, F. N. (1971). The duration of word meaning responses: Stroop interference for different preexposures of the word. Psychonomic Science, 25, 229-231.

Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.  Memory & Cognition, 1, 106-120.

Dyer, F. N. (1974). Stroop interference with long preexposures of the word: Comparison of pure and mixed preexposure sequences. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 8-10.

Egeth, H. (1977). Attention and preattention. In G. H. Bower (ed), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 277-320). New York: Academic Press.

Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-Response Compatability and Automatic Response Activation: Evidence from Psychophysiological Studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.

Eimer, M. (1997). The Lateralized Readiness Potential as an online measure of automatic response activation in S-R compatibility situations. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.) Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility (pp. 51-73). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science.

Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.

Eriksen, C. W. (1966). Independence of successive inputs and uncorrelated error in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 26-35.

Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. In C. Bundesen & H. Shibuya (Eds.) Visual Selective Attention (pp. 101-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Eriksen, C. W., & Eriksen, B. A. (1979). Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing? Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 195-205.

Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonimic Society, 23, 165-168.

Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201-204.

Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155-160.

Eriksen, C. W., & Lappin, J. S. (1965). Internal perceptual system noise and redundancy in stimulus inputs in form identification. Psychonomic Science, 2, 351-352.

Eriksen, C. W., & Lappin, J. S. (1967).  Independence in the perception of simultaneously presented forms at brief durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 468-472.

Eriksen, C. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attention focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 299-305.

Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information Processing in Visual Search: A Continuous Flow Conception and Experimental Results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.

Eriksen, C. W., & Spencer, T. (1969). Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 79(2, Pt. 2).

Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.

Estes, W. K. (1950).  Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 94-107.

Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145-154.

Estes, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 278-286.

Estes, W. K. (1974). Redundancy of noise elements and signals in visual detection of letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 53-60.

Estes, W. K. (1982). Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 353-382.

Fitts, P. M.  Human Information Processing: Applications of Information measures. In Human factors engineering.  Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan, 1964.

Fitts, P.M.  Perceptual-motor skill learning.  In A.W. Melton (ed), Categories of human learning, New York: Academic Press, 1964.

Fitts, P.M., & Biederman, I. (1965).  SR Compatibility and information reduction.  Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 408-412.

Fitts, P.M., & Deininger, R. L. (1953).    SR compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and respose codes. (1954).  Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.  

Fitts, P.M., & Posner, M. I.(1967). Human Performance. Wadsworth Publishing Co. Brooks/Cole.  Belmont, California.

Fitts., P.M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953).  SR Compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.  Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210. 

Flom, M. C., Weymouth, F. W., & Kahneman, D. (1963). Visual resolution and contour interacton. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 53, 1026-1032.

Flowers, J. H., & Wilcox, N. (1982). The effect of flanking context on visual classification: The joint contributions of interactions at different processing levels. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 581-591.

Garner, W. R. (1974). Attention: The processing of multiple sources of information. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (eds), Handbook of Perception, Vol II. (pp. 23-59). New York: Academic Press, Inc.

Garner, W. R. (1976). Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes.  Cognitive Psychology, 8, 98-123.

Garner, W. R. (1978a).  Aspects of a stimulus: Features, dimensions, and configurations. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (eds), Cognition and Categorization. (pp. 99-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Garner, W. R. (1978b). Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 287-308.

Garner, W. R. (1985). Contingent information processing: Contingent and precued classification. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 237-248.

Garner, W. R. (1988). Facilitation and interference with a separable redundant dimension in stimulus comparison. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 321-330.

Glaser, M. O., & Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time-course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875-894.

Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989).  Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.

Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988).    Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.

Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. NY: Wiley.

Green, E. J., & Barber, P. J. (1981). An auditory Stroop effect with judgements of speaker gender. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 183-194.

Grice, G. R. (1968).  Stimulus intensity and response evocation. Psychological Review, 75, 359-373.

Grice, G. R. (1972). Application of a variable criterion model to auditory reaction time as a function of the type of catch trial. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 103-107.

Grice, G. R., Boroughs, J. M., & Canham, L. (1984). Temporal dynamics of associative interference and facilitation produced by visual context. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 499-507.

Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Schafer, C. (1982). Role of the response in associative interference. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 214-216.

Grice, G. R., & Gwynne, J. W. (1985). Temporal characteristics of noise conditions producing facilitation and interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 495-501.

Grice, G. R., Nullmeyer, R., & Spiker, V. A. (1977). Application of variable criterion theory to chocie reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 431-449.

Guiard, Y., Hasbroucq, T., & Possamai, C.-A. (1994). Stimulus congruity, irrelevant spatial SR correspondence, and display-control arrangement correspondence: A reply to O’Leary, Barber, & Simon (1994). Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 210-212.

Hardzinski, M. & Pachella, R. (1980). The manipulation of stimulus quality and the definition of stimulus encoding operations in memory scanning experiments, Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 232-240.

Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.

Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. (1975). The effects of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439.

Heister, G., Ehrenstein, W. H., & Schroeder-Heister, P. (1987). Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: Effects of irrelevant stimulus location. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 195-201.

Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P., & Ehrenstein, W. H. (1990). Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a heirarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds) Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 117-143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Hodge, M. H. (1959). The influence of irrelevant information upon complex visual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1-5.

Holmgren, J. L., Joula, J. F., & Atkinson, R. C. (1974). Response latency in visual search with redundancy in the visual display. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 123-128.

Hommel, B. (1993a). Inverting the Simon Effect by Intention. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.

Hommel, B. (1993b). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 280-290.

Hommel, B. (1994a). Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 179-184.

Hommel, B. (1994b). Spontaneous Decay of Response-Code Activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.

Hommel, B. (1995a). Attentional scanning in the selection of central targets from muli-symbol strings.  In C. Bundesen & H. Shibuya (Eds.) Visual Selective Attention (pp. 119-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hommel, B. (1995b). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.

Hommel, B. (1995c). Conflict Versus Misguided Search as Explanation of S-R Correspondence Effects. Acta Psychologica, 89, 37-51.

Hommel, B. (1998). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility effects. Unpublished manuscript.

Hommel, B., & Prinz, W., (eds). (1997).  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility.  Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science.

Irwin, H. J. (1978). Input encoding strategies and attenuation of Stroop interference. Australian Journal of Psychology, 30, 177-187.

Kahneman, D., & Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (eds). Perceptual organization: Automaticity. Hillsdale, NJ:  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Keele, S. W. (1972). Attention Demands of Memory Retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 245-248.

Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130-135. [DO]

Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990).  Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – A model and taxonomy.  Psychological Review, 97, 253-270. [DO]

Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W., (1995).  Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875. [DO]

Kornblum, S., & Stevens, G. T.  (1997, April).  A computational account of dimensional overlap and the time-course of S-S and S-R consistency effects.  Paper presented at the Séminaires du Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, France. [DO]

Kornblum, S., & Stevens, G. T.  (1997, November).  Reverse consistency effects and logical recoding: Insights from four-choice tasks.  Paper presented at the 38th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia. [DO]

Kornblum, S., & Stevens, G. T. (1998). An S-S account of the flanker consistency effect. Paper presented at the 39th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas. [DO]

Kornblum, S., & Stevens, G. T.  (2001, August).  The dimensional overlap model: Cognitive basis of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility.  Plenary lecture presented at the Third International Conference on Cognitive Science, Beijing, China. [DO]

Kornblum, S., & Stevens, G. T. (2002).  Sequential effects of dimensional overlap: Findings and issues.  In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and Performance XIX. (pp. 9-54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [DO]

Kramer, A. F., Coles, M. G. H., & Logan, G. D. (1996).  Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention.  Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1974). Studies of squeezing: Handedness, responding hand, response force, and asymmetry of readiness potential. Science, 186, 545-548.

Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202, 95-115.

Ladavas, E., & Moscovitch, M. (1984). Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology:  Human Perception and Performance, 10, 205-215.

Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Percptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual tasks.  Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197.

Leuthold, H. (1994). Analysis of Spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility and the Simon Effect by Means of Overt Behavioral and Electrophysiological Measures: Covert Response Activation as a Common Basis?  Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Konstantz, Germany.

Leuthold, H. (1997). Commentary on Eimer: Stimulus-response compatibility and the Lateralized Readiness Potential.  In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.) Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility (pp. 75-84). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science.

Lippold, O. C. J. (1967). Electromyography. In P. H. Venables & I. Martin (eds.) A Manual of Psychophysiological Methods. (pp. 249-297). Amersterdam: Noth Holland.

Liu, Y. (1996). Queueing network modeling of elementary mental processes. Psychological Review, 103, 116-136.

Lu, C.-H. (1994).  Effects of ideomotor compatibility and relative timing on the processing of multidimensional stimuli.  Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. [DO]

Lu, C.-H. (1997).  Correspondence effects for irrelevant information in choice-reaction tasks: Characterizing the stimulus-response relations and the processing dynamics. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.) Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility (pp. 85-117). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science. [DO]

Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 286-298.

Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of an irrelevant location dimension on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.

Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. NY: Oxford University Press.

MacLeod, C. M. (1991).  Half a century of Research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.

MacLeod, C. M. (1998). Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitaton. Memory & Cognition, 26, 201-211.

Marks, L. E. (1987). On cross-modal similarity: Auditory-visual interactions in speeded discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 384-394.

Massaro, D. W., & Cowan, N. (1993). Information processing models: Microscopes of the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 383-425.

McClain, L. (1983). Stimulus-response compatibility affect auditory Stroop interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 266-270.

McClelland, J. (1979). On the time-relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.

McClelland, J. (1993). Toward a theory of information processing in graded, random, and interactive networks.  In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (eds), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 655-678). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Melara, R. D. (1989). Similarity Relations Among Synesthetic Stimuli and Their Attributes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 212-231.

Melara, R. D., & Marks, L. E. (1990). Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness.  Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 169-178.

Mewaldt, S. P., Connelly, C. L., & Simon, J. R. (1980). Response selection in choice reaction time:  Test of a buffer model. Memory & Cognition, 8, 606-611.

Meyer, D. E., Irwin, D. E., Osman, A. M., Kounios, J. (1988). The dynamics of cognition and action: Mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition. Psychological Review, 95, 183-237.

Meyer, D. E., Osman, A. M., Irwin, D. E., & Yantis, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology, 26, 3-67.

Meyer, D. E., Yantis, S., Osman, A. M. & Smith, J. E. K. (1985). Temporal properties of human information processing: Tests of discrete versus continuous models. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 445-518.

Miller, J. (1982a). Effects of noise letters on decisions:  Discrete or continuous flow of information? Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 227-236.

Miller, J. (1982b). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273-296.

Miller, J. (1983). Can response preparation begin before stimulus recognition finishes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 161-182.

Miller, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 419-434.

Miller, J. (1988). Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: Theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychologica, 67, 191-257.

Miller, J. (1991). The Flanker Compatibility Effect as a Function of Visual Angle, Attentional Focus, Visual Transients, and Perceptual Load:  A Search for Boundary Conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 270-288.

Miller, J. (1993). A queue-series model for reaction time, with discrete-stage and continuous-flow models as special cases. Psychological Review, 100, 702-715.

Miller, J., & Bauer, D. W. (1981). Visual similarity and discrimination demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 39-55.

Miller, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological Evidence for Temporal Overlap Among Contingent Mental Processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195-209.

Miller, J., Schaffer, R., & Hackley, S. A. (1991). Effects of Preliminary Information in a Go Versus No-Go Task. Acta Psychologica , 76, 241-292.

Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Mordkoff, T. (1991). A unified model of visual attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Blatimore, Maryland.

Mordkoff, T. (1996). Selective attention and internal constraints: There is more to the flanker effect than biased contingencies. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (eds). Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (pp. 483-502). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Mordkoff, T., Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1990). Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 157-168.

Morin, R., Forrin, B., & Archer, W. (1961). Information processing behavior: The role of irrelevant stimulus information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 89-96.

Morton, J. (1969). Categories of interference: Verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 329-346.

Morton, J., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Selective attention to words and colours. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 387-397.

Mulder, G., Smid, H. G. O. M., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1993). On the transfer of partial information between perception and action.  In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (eds), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 567-588). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mullin, P. A., Egeth, H. E., & Mordkoff, T. (1988). Redundant-target detection and processing capacity: The problem of positional preferences. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 607-610.

Newell, A. (1973).  You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium.  In W.G. Chase (Ed.) Visual Information Processing (pp. 283-308). New York: Academic Press.

Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P. S., & Laird, J. E. (1989). Symbolic architectures for cognition. In M. I. Posner (ed.) Foundations of Cognitive Science (pp. 93-131). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nicoletti, R., & Umilta, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 333-343.

Nicoletti, R., & Umilta, C. (1985). Responding with Hand and Foot: The Right/left Prevalence in Spatial Compatibility Is Still Present. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 211-216.

O’Leary, M. J., & Barber, P. J.  (1993). Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfromance, 19, 830-844.

O’Leary, M. J., Barber, P. J., & Simon, J. R. (1994). Does stimulus correspondence account for the Simon effect? Comments on Hasbroucq & Guiard (1991). Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 203-209.

Osman, A., Bashore, T., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1988). A psychophysiological study of response preparation based on partial information. Psychophysiology, 25, 426.

Osman, A., Bashore, T., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the Transmission of Partial Information:  Inferences From Movement-Related Brain Potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology:  Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.

Palef, S. R. (1978). Judging pictoral and linguistic aspects of space. Memory & Cognition, 6, 70-75.

Phaf, R., van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Hudson, P. (1990). SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273-341.

Pike, R. (1973). Response-latency models for signal detection. Psychological Review, 80, 53-68.

Posner, M. I. (1964). Information reduction in the analysis of sequential tasks. Psychological Review, 71, 491-504.

Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (ed), Information Processing and Cognition. (pp. 55-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Postman, L. (1955). Association theory and perceptual learning. Psychological Review, 62, 438-446.

Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships Between Perception and Action: Current Approaches. (pp. 167-201). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Prinz, W. (1997). Why Donders has led us astray. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.) Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility (pp. 247-268). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science.

Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (1998). Lateralized warning tones produce typical irrelevant-location effects on choice reactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 124-129.

Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1986). Salient-Feature Coding Operations in Spatial Precuing Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 277-285.

Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (eds). (1990).  Stimulus- response compatibility: An integrated perspective.  Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Proctor, R. W., Reeve, T. G., & van Zandt, T. (1992). Salient-features coding in response selection. In G. E. Stelmachs & J. Requin (eds), Tutorials in Motor Behavior, (pp. 272-741). Amsterdam: North Holland.

Ragot, R., & Fiori, N. (1994). Mental processing during reactions toward and away from a stimulus: An ERP analysis of auditory congruence and S-R compatibility. Psychophysiology, 31, 439-446.

Ragot, R., & Guiard, Y. (1992). Stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility: Two variables disentangled in an auditory RT task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 219-232.

Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.

Ratcliff, R. (1980). A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 21, 178‑184.

Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 88, 552-572.

Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238-255.

Rayner, K., & Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 207-222.

Redding, G. M., & Gerjets, D. A. (1977). Stroop effect: Interference and facilitation with verbal and manual responses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 11-17.

Requin, J., Riehle, A., & Seal, J. (1993).  Neuronal networks for motor preparation.  In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (eds.), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 745-770). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L. G., & Umilta, C. (1986). What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? Acta Psychologica, 62, 89-100.

Roberts, S., & Pashler, H. (2000).How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review, 107, 358-367.

Roberts, S., & Sternberg, S. (1993). The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: Tests of three alternatives.  In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (eds), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 611-654). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umilta, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1353-1364.

Rumelhart, D. E. (1989). The architecture of mind: A connectionist approach.  In M. I. Posner (ed.) Foundations of Cognitive Science (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G.E., & McClelland, J.L. (1986).  A General Framework for Parallel Distributed Processing.  In D. E. Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing (pp. 45-76).  Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmachs & J. Requin (eds), Tutorials in Motor Behavior, (pp. 331-354). Amsterdam: North Holland.

Sanders, A. F. (1990).  Issues and trensd in the debate on discrete versus continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica, 74, 123-168.

Sanders, A. F. (1993). Performance theory and measurement through chronometric analysis.  In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (eds), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 689-700). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Schweickert, R. (1993). Information, time, and the structure of mental events: A twenty-five year review.  In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (eds), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 535-566). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Schweickert, R. & Giorgini, M. (1999). Response time distributions: Some simple effects of factors selectively influencing mental processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 269-288.

Seymour, P. H. (1973). Stroop interference in naming and verifying spatial locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 95-100.

Shafer, W. O., & LaBerge, D. (1979). Automatic processing of unattended words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 413-426.

Shaffer, L. H. (1965). Choice reaction time with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 284-288.

Shiu, L-P & Kornblum S. (1999) Stimulus-Response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: A dimensional overlap account.  Perception &Psychophysics, 61(8), 1613-1623.

Shor, R. E. (1971). Symbol processing speed differences and symbol interference effects in a variety of concept domains. Journal of General Psychology, 85, 187-205.

Simon, H. A. (1981).  The sciences of the artificial. (second edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Simon, H. A., & Kaplan, C. A. (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. I. Posner (ed.) Foundations of Cognitive Science (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.

Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds) Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-88). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Simon, J. R., & Acosta, E. Jr. (1982). Effect of irrelevant information on the processing of relevant information:  Facilitation and/or interference?  The influence of experimental design. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 383-388.

Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Jr., & Mewaldt, S. P. (1975). Effect of locus of warning tone on auditory choice reaction time. Memory & Cognition, 3, 167-170.

Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Jr., Mewaldt, S. P., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 16-22.

Simon, J. R., & Berbaum, K. (1990). Effect of Conflicting Cues on Information Processing: The ‘Stroop Effect’ vs. The ‘Simon Effect’. Acta Psychologica, 73, 159-170.

Simon, J. R., Craft, J. L., & Small, A. M. Jr. (1971). Reactions toward the apparent source of an auditory stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 203-206.

Simon, J. R., Craft, J. L., & Webster, J. B. (1973). Analysis of correct responses and errors over a five-day period. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 175-178.

Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97-102.

Simon, J. R., Paullin, C., Overmeyer, S. P., & Berbaum, K. (1985). Reaction time to word meaning and ink color of laterally presented Stroop stimuli: Effects of handedness and sex. International Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 21-33.

Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.

Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M. Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information:  Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433-435.

Simon, J. R., Small, A. M. Jr., Zigler, R. A., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Response interference in an information processing task: Sensory versus perceptual factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 311-314.

Simon, J. R., Sly, P., & Vilapakkam, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions toward the stimulus source. Acta Psychologica, 47, 63-81.

Simon, J. R., & Sudalaimuthu, P. (1979). Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 176-187.

Smid, H. G. O., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1990). Selecive response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169-201.

Smith, P., & Brebner, J. (1983). S-R compatibility: The relative effects of “relevant” spatial and non-spatial variables. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 1-10.

Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Hermanutz, M. (1993). Covert effects of alcohol revealed by event-related potentials.  Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 127-135.

Sternberg, S.  (1969).  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Doners’ method.  Acta Psychologica, 30, Attention & Performance II (W. G. Koster, ed.), 276 – 315.

Stevens, G. T. (2000). The locus of consistency effects in Simon, Eriksen, and Stroop tasks: New data and a comparison of models. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. (Advisor: Sylvan Kornblum, Ph.D.) [DO]

Stevens, G. T., & Kornblum, S.  (1998, July).  The flanker consistency effect: S-S or S-R? Poster presented at the meeting of Attention and Performance XVIII, London. [DO]

Stevens, G. T., & Kornblum, S.  (1999, November).  Reaction time distributions and the locus of processing variability in the Simon task.  Poster presented at the 40th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.

Stevens, G. T., & Kornblum, S.  (2000, July).  Intentional goals and consistency: The effect of irrelevant response dimensions. Poster presented at the meeting of Attention and Performance XIX, Kloster Irsee. [DO]

Stevens, G. T.,  Whipple, A., Requin, J., & Kornblum, S.  (1996, November).  The time-course of S-S and S-R consistency effects: Data and model.  Poster presented at the 37th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago. [DO]

Stoffels, E. J., & van der Molen, M. W. (1988). Effects of visual and auditory noise on visual choice reaction time in a continuous-flow paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 7-14.

Stoffer, T. H. (1991). Attentional zooming and spatial S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127-135.

Stoffer, T. H., & Umilta, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon effect. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.) Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility (pp. 181-208). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science.

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

Swets, J. A. (1964). Signal detection and recognition by human subjects. NY: Wiley.

Tanner, W. P., & Swets, J. A. (1954). A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychological Review, 61, 401-409.

Toma, R. J., & Tsao, Y.-C. (1985). Interference effects in the picture-word Stroop task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 223-228.

Umilta, C., & Liotti, M. (1987).  Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 81-90.

Umilta, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and Coding Effects in S-R Compatibility Due to Irrelevant Spatial Cues. In M. I. Posner, I. Michael, & O. S. Marin (eds). Attention and Performance XI (pp. 457-471).  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Umilta, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds) Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Umilta, C., & Zorzi, M. (1997). Commentary on Barber and O’Leary: Learning and attention in S-R compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.) Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility (pp. 173-180). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science.

van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1975). Some evidence for a limited-capacity parallel self-terminating process in simple visual tasks. Acta Psychologica, 39, 21-41.

van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1990). Visual information processing and selection.  In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships Between Perception and Action: Current Approaches.  Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1988). Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia, 26, 435-444.

Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1990). Attentional processes in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds) Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 261-275). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Vizri, R. A., & Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13, 304-319.

Wald, A. (1947). Sequential analysis. NY: Wiley.

Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility effects involving the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.

Wallace, R. J. (1972). Spatial S-R compatibility effects involving kinesthetic cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 163-168.

Wascher, E., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996).  The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 149-162.

Weeks, D. J., Chua, R., & Hamblin, K. (1996). Attention shifts and the Simon effect: A failure to replicate Stoffer (1991). Psychological Research, 58, 246-253.

Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (eds). Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (pp. 45-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Yantis, S., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the Locus of Visual Selection: Evidence From Focused Attention Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 135-149.

Zhang, H. (1999).  The Simon effect and its reversal in three-choice Hedge and Marsh tasks: Evidence for irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility and stimulus congruity.  Unpublished manuscript.

Zhang, J. (2001). Dimension overlap and S-S and S-R compatibility: A structural model. In L. Chen and Y. Zhuo (Eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Cognitive Science (ICCS2001), Heifei, China: Press of University of Science and Technology of China (pp 377-381).

Zhang, J. & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis of DeJong, Liang and Lauber’s (1994) dual-process model of the Simon Effect, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1543-1551.

Zhang, H., & Kornblum, S. (1998).The effects of S-R mapping, and irrelevant S-R and S‑S overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single carrier stimuli.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance, 24, 3-29.

Zhang, J., Riehle, A., Requin, J. and Kornblum, S. (1997). Dynamics of single neuron activity in primary motor cortex related to sensorimotor transformation. Journal of Neuroscience, 17: 2227-2246

Zorzi, M., & Umilta, C. (1995).  A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 58, 193-205.